|
Imam Shafi`i (1ª Parte)
|
||
|
Por el Dr. G. F. Haddad (Pronto en Castellano)
|
||
|
Muhammad
ibn Idris ibn al-`Abbas, al-Imam al-Shafi`i, Abu `Abd Allah al-Shafi`i al-Hijazi
al-Qurashi al-Hashimi al-Muttalibi (d. 204), the offspring of the House of
the Prophet, the peerless one of the great mujtahid imams and
jurisprudent par excellence, the scrupulously pious ascetic and
Friend of Allah, he laid down the foundations of fiqh in his Risala,
which he said he revised and re-read four hundred times, then said: "Only
Allah’s Book is perfect and free from error." He
is the cousin of the Prophet - Allah’s blessings and peace upon him -
descending from al-Muttalib who is the brother of Hashim, `Abd al-Muttalib’s
father. Someone praised the Banu Hashim in front of the Prophet, whereby
he interlaced the fingers of his two hands and said: "We and they are
but one and the same thing." Al-Nawawi listed three peculiar merits
of al-Shafi`i: his sharing the Prophet’s lineage at the level of their
common ancestor `Abd Manaf; his birth in the Holy Land of Palestine and
upbringing in Mecca; and his education at the hands of superlative
scholars together with his own superlative intelligence and knowledge of
the Arabic language. To this Ibn Hajar added two more: the hadith of the
Prophet, "O Allah! Guide Quraysh, for the science of the scholar that
comes from them will encompass the earth. O Allah! You have let the first
of them taste bitterness, so let the latter of them taste reward."
Another hadith of the Prophet says: "Truly, Allah shall send forth
for this Community, at the onset of every hundred years, someone who will
renew their Religion for them." The scholars agreed, among them Abu
Qilaba (d. 276) and Imam Ahmad, that the first narration signified al-Shafi`i,
and the second signified `Umar ibn `Abd al-`Aziz and then al-Shafi`i. He
was born in Ghazza or `Asqalan in 150, the year of Abu Hanifa’s death,
and moved to Mecca at the age of two, following his father’s death,
where he grew up. He was early a skillful archer, then he took to learning
language and poetry until he gave himself to fiqh, beginning with
hadith. He memorized the Qur’an at age seven, then Malik’s Muwatta’
at age ten, at which time his teacher would deputize him to teach in his
absence. At age thirteen he went to see Malik, who was impressed by his
memory and intelligence. Malik
ibn Anas and Muhammad ibn al-Hasan al-Shaybani were among his most
prominent teachers and he took position against both of them in fiqh.
Al-Shafi`i said: "From Muhammad ibn al-Hasan I wrote a camel-load."
Al-Hakim narrated from `Abd Allah ibn `Abd al-Hakam: "Al-Shafi`i
never ceased to speak according to Malik’s position and he would say:
‘We do not differ from him other than in the way of his companions,’
until some young men spoke unbecomingly at length behind his back,
whereupon al-Shafi`i resolved to put his differences with Malik in writing.
Otherwise, his whole life he would say, whenever asked something: ‘This
is what the Teacher said’ - hâdha qawl al-ustadh - meaning Malik." Like
Abu Hanifa and al-Bukhari, he recited the entire Qur’an each day at
prayer, and twice a day in the month of Ramadan. Al-Muzani
said: "I never saw one more handsome of face than al-Shafi`i. If he
grasped his beard it would not exceed his fist." Ibn Rahuyah
described him in Mecca as wearing bright white clothes with an intensely
black beard. Al-Za`farani said that when he was in Baghdad in the year 195
he dyed his beard with henna. Abu
`Ubayd al-Qasim ibn Sallam said: "If the intelligence of an entire
nation was brought together he would have encompassed it." Similarly,
al-Muzani said: "I have been looking into al-Shafi`i’s Risala
for fifty years, and I do not recall a single time I looked at it without
learning some new benefit." Al-Sakhawi
in the introduction to his al-Jawahir wa al-Durar and others
narrate that someone criticized Ahmad ibn Hanbal for attending the fiqh
sessions of al-Shafi`i and leaving the hadith sessions of Sufyan ibn `Uyayna.
Ahmad replied: "Keep quiet! If you miss a hadith with a shorter chain
you can find it elsewhere with a longer chain and it will not harm you.
But if you do not have the reasoning of this man [al-Shafi`i], I fear you
will never be able to find it elsewhere." Ahmad is also related by
his students Abu Talib and Humayd ibn Zanjuyah to say: "I never saw
anyone adhere more to hadith than al-Shafi`i. No-one preceded him in
writing down the hadith in a book." The meaning of this is that al-Shafi`i
possessed the understanding of hadith after which Ahmad sought, as
evidenced by the latter’s statement: "How rare is fiqh among
the scholars of hadith!" This is a reference to the hadith: "It
may be one carries understanding (fiqh) without being a person of
understanding (faqîh)." Sufyan himself would defer to al-Shafi`i
in matters of tafsîr and fatwa. Yunus ibn Abi Ya`la said:
"Whenever al-Shafi`i went into tafsîr, it was as if he had
witnessed the revelation." Ahmad ibn Hanbal also said: "Not one
of the scholars of hadith touched an inkwell nor a pen except he owed a
huge debt to al-Shafi`i." Al-Shafi`i
was known for his peculiar strength in Arabic language, poetry, and
philology. Bayhaqi narrated: [From
Ibn Hisham:] I was al-Shafi`i’s sitting-companion for a long time, and I
never heard him use except a word which, carefully considered, one would
not find (in its context) a better word in the entire Arabic language. . .
. Al-Shafi`i’s discourse, in relation to language, is a proof in itself. [From
al-Hasan ibn Muhammad al-Za`farani:] A group of bedouins used to frequent
al-Shafi`i’s gathering with us and sit in a corner. One day I asked
their leader: "You are not interested in scholarship; why do you keep
coming to sit with us?" They said: "We come to hear al-Shafi`i’s
language." Al-Shafi`i
trod the path of the Salaf in avoiding any interpretation of the
verses and narrations pertaining to the divine attributes. He practiced
"relegation of the meaning" (tafwîd al-mi`na) to a
higher source, as established in his saying: "I leave the meaning of
the verses of the Attributes to Allah, and I leave the meaning of the
hadiths of the attributes to Allah’s Messenger." At the same time,
rare instances of interpretation are recorded from him. Thus al-Bayhaqi
relates that al-Muzani reported from al-Shafi`i the following commentary
on the verse: "To Allah belong the East and the West, and wheresoever
you turn, there is Allah’s face (wajh)" (2:115): "It
means – and Allah knows best – thither is the bearing (wajh)
towards which Allah has directed you." Al-Hakkari (d. 486) related in
his book `Aqida al-Shafi`i that the latter said: "We affirm
those attributes, and we negate from them likeness between them and
creation (al-tashbîh), just as He negated it from Himself when He
said: ‘There is nothing whatsoever like unto Him’(42:11)." Al-Shafi`i’s
hatred of dialectic theology (kalâm) was based on his extreme
caution against errors which bear heavy consequences as they induce one
into false beliefs. Among his sayings concerning this: "It is better
for a scholar of knowledge to give a fatwa after which he is said
to be wrong than to theologize and then be said to be a heretic (zindîq).
I hate nothing more than theology and theologians." Dhahabi comments:
"This indicates that Abu `Abd Allah’s position concerning error in
the principles of the Religion (al-usûl) is that it is not the
same as error in the course of scholarly exertion in the branches."
The reason is that in belief and doctrine neither ijtihâd nor
divergences are permitted. In this respect al-Shafi`i said: "It
cannot be asked ‘Why?’ concerning the principles, nor ‘How?’"
Yet al-Shafi`i did not completely close the door to the use of kalâm
in defense of the Sunna, as shown below and in the notice on Ahmad ibn
Hanbal. Yunus
ibn Abi Ya`la narrated that al-Shafi`i defined the "principles"
as: "The Qur’an, the Sunna, analogy (al-qiyâs), and
consensus (al-ijmâ`)"; he defined the latter to mean: "The
adherence of the Congregation (jamâ`a) of the Muslims to the
conclusions of a given ruling pertaining to what is permitted and what is
forbidden after the passing of the Prophet, blessings and peace be upon
him." Al-Shafi`i
did not close the door on the right use of kalâm as is clear from
Ibn Abi Hatim’s narration from al-Rabi` of his words: "If I wished,
I could produce a book against each one of those who deviated, but
dialectic theology is none of my business, and I would not like to be
attributed any part in it." Similar to it is his advice to his
student al-Muzani: "Take proofs from creation about the Creator, and
do not burden yourself with the knowledge of what your mind did not reach."
Ibn Abi Hatim himself spoke similarly when he was told of Ibn Khuzayma’s
unsuccessful attempt at kalâm: "It is preferable not to
meddle with what we did not learn." Note that al-Shafi`i also spoke
of his wish not to have a single letter out of all his works attributed to
him, regardless of topic. Al-Shafi`i’s
attitude towards tasawwuf was as strict as with kalâm, and
he both praised it and denigrated its abuse at the hands of its corrupters.
In criticism of the latter he said: "No-one becomes a Sufi in the
morning except he ends up a dolt by noon" while on the other hand he
declared in his Diwan: "Be at the same time a faqîh
and a Sufi." In Mecca al-Shafi`i was the student of Fudayl ibn `Iyad.
Imam al-Nawawi in his Bustan al-`Arifin fi al-Zuhd wa al-Tasawwuf
("The Garden of the Gnostics in Asceticism and Tasawwuf")
narrated from al-Shafi`i the saying: "Only the sincere one (al-mukhlis)
can recognize self-display (al-riyâ’)." Al-Nawawi comments:
"This means that it is impossible to know the reality of self-display
and see its hidden shades except for one who resolutely seeks (arâda)
sincerity. Such a one strives for a long time, searching, meditating,
examining at length within himself until he knows, or knows something of
what self-display is. This does not happen for everyone. Indeed, this
happens only with special ones (al-khawâss). But for a given
individual to claim that he knows what self-diplay is, this is real
ignorance on his part." Al-Shafi`i
deferred primacy in the foundations of fiqh to Imam Abu Hanifa with
his famous statement: "People are all the children of Abu Hanifa in fiqh."
Ibn Hajar al-Haytami mentioned in the thirty-fifth chapter of his book on
Imam Abu Hanifa entitled al-Khayrat al-Hisan: "When Imam al-Shafi`i
was in Baghdad, he would visit the grave of Imam Abu Hanifa, greet him,
and then ask Allah for the fulfillment of his need through his means." Two
schools of legal thought or madhahib are actually attributed to al-Shafi`i,
englobing his writings and legal opinions (fatâwa). These two
schools are known in the terminology of jurists as "The Old" (al-qadîm)
and "The New" (al-jadîd), corresponding respectively to
his stays in Iraq and Egypt. The most prominent transmitters of the New
among al-Shafi`i’s students are al-Buwayti, al-Muzani, al-Rabi` al-Muradi,
and al-Bulqini, in Kitab al-Umm ("The Motherbook"). The
most prominent transmitters of the Old are Ahmad ibn Hanbal, al-Karabisi,
al-Za`farani, and Abu Thawr, in Kitab al-Hujja ("Book of the
Proof"). What is presently known as the Shafi`i position refers to
the New except in approximately twenty-two Questions, in which Shafi`i
scholars and muftis have retained the positions of the Old. Al-Subki
related that the Shafi`i scholars considered al-Rabi`s narration from al-Shafi`i
sounder from the viewpoint of transmission, while they considered al-Muzani’s
sounder from the viewpoint of fiqh, although both were established
hadith masters. Al-Shafi`i said to al-Rabi`: "How I love you!"
and another time: "O Rabi`! If I could feed you the Science I would
feed it to you." Al-Qaffal al-Shashi in his Fatawa relates
that al-Rabi` was slow in his understanding, and that al-Shafi`i once
repeated an explanation forty times for him in a gathering, yet he did not
understand it then got up and left in embarrassment. Later, al-Shafi`i
called him in private and resumed explaining it to him until he understood.
This shows the accuracy of Ibn Rahuyah’s statement: "I consider the
best part of me the time when I fully understand al-Shafi`i’s discourse." |
Continuar