The Challenge of The Faith of Islam

By Leonardo Boff

A lot is being written about the Muslim reaction to the caricatures of the Prophet Mohammed.   Yet, nothing I have read so far addresses, in my opinion, the essence, the gist of the question. Mauro Santayana, in the Jornal do Brasil, came the closest.   We desperately need a deeper analysis, because therein lies the key to the fuse of the possible war of civilizations, as was suggested by Samuel P. Huntington is his controversial book Clash of Civilizations, (1996.)

Those who say it is a matter of fundamentalism are wrong. To Islam, the modern culture of the West, now globalized, is responsible for the caricatures. It is considered to be a culture without faith, one that is exploitative, immoral, bellicose, arrogant and a violator of the treaties of world order.   Western culture considers itself universal, and therefore worthy of being imposed on the whole world.   Its pretensions of universalism are expressed through imperialism, as Bush's foreign policy and the declarations of Berlusconi explicitly show. We must recognize that it is the West that is the main source of instability, and of the potential conflict in a pluri-civilizational world. Its arrogance, also embedded in the Christian churches, can lead us all to total disaster.

To the West, Islamic radicalism, founded in pride of their culture and in feelings of superiority for having kept alive the public faith in God, is behind the reactions to the caricatures. But there is also the rancor derived from the fact that their territories are militarily occupied because of their oil, and of being considered anti-modern, fundamentalists and havens for world terrorism.

We find ourselves here with mutual prejudices that, acted out in a globalized context, can generate violence difficult to control.

The true bone of contention is faith, and the place it should have in the personal and social life. Modern societies in the West are daughters of enlightened reason. Only that reality which withstands the screening of critical reason is legitimated, and traditional faith has not passed that test. Faith is not a determinant factor in Western society. Faith has been relegated to the private world.   Seen from the outside, the West, socially, has no faith. The West lives etsi Deus non daretur («as if God did not exist»), according to the famous statement of the martyr of Nazism theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer*, who foresaw the dimming of faith in Western society.

Such a point of view is unacceptable to Islam. To Islam, a society without an institutional dimension of faith is unthinkable. It is to fail to see meaning in a universe sustained by the Creator of heaven and Earth, it is to fail to recognize human beings as brothers and sisters... This does not necessarily lead to a theocratic state, as we can see today in Indonesia, the largest Muslim State in the world. The State explicitly recognizes faith in God in its organization, without identifying that God with the God of Islam, nor with the Christian God, or with the God of other religions. It is a nonconfessional state, with strong national identity and ecumenical faith. This public proclamation of God and the fraternity of all human beings is the inheritance of Mohammed that will never be renounced.   But, the West considers those values to be pre-modern ideas.

To make caricatures of the Prophet is to ridicule the faith that guides the life of millions of humans. That is why the reaction of Muslims all over the world is understandable. Faith is central to Islam but irrelevant to the West. The caricatures seek to deride this difference. The lack of respect for the Sacred is a testament to the profound spiritual decadence of the West.  

*Dietrich Bonhoeffer, (1906-1945). A German theologian whose strong opposition to Nazism cost him his life. His faith and heroism, even more than his ideas, made him one of the most influential Christian philosophers.

Free translation from the Spanish sent by
mj.gm@voila.fr, done at
REFUGIO DEL RIO GRANDE, Texas